Question ID
2015_1776
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Credit risk
Article
197
Paragraph
1
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
N/A
Type of submitter
Accounting firm
Subject matter
Credit Risk Mitigation
Question

Can an institution legally "ring fence" cash it has to mitigate an exposure to a counterparty (using it as financial collateral)? The institution does not wish to notify the counterparty. The CRR is not clear on whether financial collateral used to mitigate an exposure must come from the counterparty or not.

Background on the question

An institution wishes to mitigate an exposure they have. They wish to do this without involving or notifying the counterparty. They are not permitted to receive guarantees from their parent or to have an asset exposure to their parent as part of their license condition.

Submission date
Final publishing date
Final answer

Cash used to mitigate an exposure pursuant to Article 197(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) must constitute a 'funded credit protection' as defined in Article 4(58) of the CRR. As such, Article 4(57) of the CRR states that this 'credit risk mitigation [...][is] used by an institution to reduce the credit risk associated with an exposure'.

Given that the cash described in the question comes from the institution itself, it does not provide any credit risk reduction. Therefore, such cash is not a 'funded credit protection' and as a result, is not eligible under Article 194(3) of the CRR.

Regarding the specific case of cash, Article 197(1)(a) of the CRR that specifies the eligibility of collateral under all approaches and methods, refers to 'cash on deposit', making it clear that cash collateral should be received by the institution.

Status
Final Q&A
Answer prepared by
Answer prepared by the EBA.
Note to Q&A

Update 26.03.2021: This Q&A has been reviewed in the light of the changes introduced to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) and continues to be relevant.

Disclaimer

The Q&A refers to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.