- Question ID
-
2015_2434
- Legal act
- Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
- Topic
- Resolution tools and powers
- Article
-
44
- Paragraph
-
2, 3
- Subparagraph
-
g
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
n.a.
- Type of submitter
-
Competent authority
- Subject matter
-
Exclusion of “financial services” from the exemption from bail-in
- Question
-
Would the Commission agree that domestic legislation which excludes "financial services" from the exemption from bail-in retains this prerogative when implementing the BRRD?
- Background on the question
-
Article 44(2)(g)(ii) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) states the following:
"Resolution authorities shall not exercise the write down or conversion powers in relation to the following liabilities whether they are governed by the law of a Member State or of a third country: [...]a commercial or trade creditor arising from the provision to the institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of goods or services that are critical to the daily functioning of its operations, including IT services, utilities and the rental, servicing and upkeep of premises,"
The non-exhaustive list of goods / services in the text are non-financial in nature and not mentioning financial services. Hence they can be interpreted as intended to apply to non-financial services when referring to "commercial or trade creditors". A creditor providing funding who is not a financial counterparty should be exempt from bail-in. It would be clearly problematic if a lender to an institution was exempt from bail-in on the basis that the relevant funding is deemed critical to the institution. Also, Article 1(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) permits to be 1dstricter 1d on institutions, hence it would be possible to clarify the above in domestic law.
- Submission date
- Final publishing date
-
- Final answer
-
Liabilities owed to firms in the financial sector must not be automatically exempted from bail-in, except where the claims relate to a liability described in Article 44(2), or when they fall under the exceptional circumstances described in Article 44(3).
Article 44(2)(g)(ii) provides exemption from bail-in for liabilities to a commercial or trade creditor arising from the provision to the institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of goods or services that are critical to the daily functioning of its operations, including IT services, utilities and the rental, servicing and upkeep of premises. This should not be interpreted as excluding liabilities which are critical to an institution’s funding needs. Rather this intended to capture creditors who provide goods or services of an operational rather than a financial nature.
Disclaimer:
This question goes beyond matters of consistent and effective application of the regulatory framework. A Directorate General of the Commission (Directorate General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union) has prepared the answer, albeit that only the Court of Justice of the European Union can provide definitive interpretations of EU legislation. This is an unofficial opinion of that Directorate General, which the European Banking Authority publishes on its behalf. The answers are not binding on the European Commission as an institution. You should be aware that the European Commission could adopt a position different from the one expressed in such Q&As, for instance in infringement proceedings or after a detailed examination of a specific case or on the basis of any new legal or factual elements that may have been brought to its attention.
- Status
-
Final Q&A
- Answer prepared by
-
Answer prepared by the European Commission because it is a matter of interpretation of Union law.
- Note to Q&A
-
Update 26.03.2021: This Q&A has been reviewed in the light of the changes introduced to Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) and continues to be relevant.
Disclaimer
The Q&A refers to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.