Question ID
2017_3287
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
Article
415
Paragraph
3
Subparagraph
b
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
Article/Paragraph
Annex XXII, chapter 1.1.4, and annex XXIII, paragraph 12 in EBA/ITS/2017/01
Type of submitter
Consultancy firm
Subject matter
Calculation of original and residual maturities in the context of ALMM (C 66.01) for puttable bonds
Question

Assume the following data for a puttable bond:
Origination date:                               30.08.2018
First investors’ put optionality:          15.02.2019
Second investors’ put optionality:     15.05.2019
Final maturity:                                   30.10.2020

From our point of view, the instructions of annex XXII (reference 1.1.4) and annex XXIII (paragraph 12) in combination with the answers to the question 2 in EBA/ITS/2017/01 suggest this bond should be assigned with original (OM) and residual maturities (RM), both in days, for illustrative reporting dates as shown below:
Reporting date: 31.08.2018: OM 169; RM 168
Reporting date: 30.09.2018: OM 169; RM 138
Reporting date: 30.12.2018: OM 169; RM 47
Reporting date: 31.03.2019: OM 169; RM 45
Reporting date: 30.06.2019: OM 169; RM 488
Reporting date: 30.09.2019: OM 169; RM 396

Background on the question

The instructions for calculating original and residual maturities in the context of the changed requirements for ALMM appear technically as transparent. However, as the given definition of original maturity is kind of unexpected, the further clarification by an illustrative example is highly appreciated.

Submission date
Final publishing date
Final answer

In accordance with paragraph 2 of Part I of Annex XXIII to Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (ITS on Supervisory Reporting) as amended by Regulation (EU) 2017/2114, reporting of template C 66.01 refers to the residual maturity of contractual flows resulting from legally binding agreements. The flows are to be reported according to their residual maturity in the relevant time bucket. Flows with optionality should be reported on the basis of a conservative approach according to Part I, paragraph 12 of Annex XXIII.

With regard to the example above, the flows of a puttable bond are to be reported as follows:

  • If the reporting reference date is 31/08/2018 and the first investor’s put optionality is 15/02/2019, the relevant outflow shall be assigned to the time bucket of the first possible put optionality (greater than 5 month up to 6 month).
  • For the reporting reference dates after the first investor’s optionality date, the option should be presumed to be exercised at the second investor’s put optionality and accordingly assigned to the relevant time bucket.
  • For the reporting dates after the second investor’s optionality date it has to be assumed that the repayment takes place at the maturity date, thus the outflow has to be assigned to the relevant time bucket of the maturity date.

 

Status
Final Q&A
Answer prepared by
Answer prepared by the EBA.

Disclaimer

The Q&A refers to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.