- Question ID
-
2019_4919
- Legal act
- Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
- Topic
- Other topics
- Article
-
4
- Paragraph
-
14
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
n/a
- Type of submitter
-
Competent authority
- Subject matter
-
Interpretation of payment instrument
- Question
-
What devices or procedures can be considered as payment instrument as per Art. 4(14) of PSD2.
- Background on the question
-
The Central Bank of Member State A as competent authority (CA) in Member State A has received several notifications based on the Article 37 of PSD2. In those cases, CAs need to make a decision if a given solution meets the requirements of limited network exclusion. However to apply an exclusion first that solution should fall under the definition of one of the payment services described in PSD2. Mostly, it is issuing of payment instruments and/or acquiring of payment transactions. Therefore, the question occurred that a given solution (eg. a fuel card) based on the business model can be considered as payment instrument hence the CAs should consider the application of an exclusion. In the case of a given multinational oil company - as per the statement of the company - the fuel cards are not used for initiating the payment transaction, in other words there is no payment order given with the card itself, but there is an identification and an “authorisation” of the fact whether the oil company issued the fuel card has a deferred payment agreement with the card holder. After a certain period, a formal invoice is issued and the settlement of the invoice is done via a regular credit transfer.
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
Please note that as part of adjustments to the Single Rulebook Q&A process, agreed by the EBA and the European Commission, it has been decided to reject outstanding questions submitted before 1 January 2020, when the Q&A process was updated as part of the last ESAs Review. In particular, the question that you have submitted has now regrettably been rejected and will not be addressed.
If you believe your question would still benefit from clarification, you are invited to resubmit your question, adapting it to reflect any legislative, regulatory or other relevant developments that may have occurred since the initial date of submission. The EBA will aim to address resubmitted questions as a matter of priority. When considering to resubmit, you are kindly requested to observe the updated admissibility criteria agreed in the context of the adjustment of the Q&A process, available in the Additional background and guidance for asking questions. We hope for your understanding.
For further information please refer to the press release and the updated Q&A page.
- Status
-
Rejected question