When calculating the risk-weighted exposure for the positions in a securitization, for the purpose of own funds requirements, as well as for the columns 447 and 448, a number of positions might be classified as having a 1.250% risk weight, that is, they may be considered for deduction from own funds according to point (k) of Article 36(1) of CRR. The number of such positions may be different depending on the method used, so, in order to carry out the comparison between methods, objective of columns 447 and 448, the treatment of such positions in the calculation should be coherent and homogeneous. Let´s consider an institution that holds a position consisting of 1,000 EUR of securitization bonds, it calculates its own funds requirement using SEC-SA. According to this method, a number of bonds worth 900 EUR should be risk-weighted at 100%, while 100 EUR should be risk-weighted at 1.250%. The institution opts for deducting them from the exposure value, so the final RWE is 900 EUR * 100% = 900 EUR. Exposure Value --> 1000 Deduction from own funds --> -100 Total RWE --> 900 In order to fill in column 447, the institution applies SEC-ERBA to the same position. In this way, only 80 EUR are classified as having 1.250% risk weight, while the remaining 920 EUR are risk weighted at an average of 200%. The institution would deduct those 80 EUR from the exposure value instead of risk weighting them at 1.250%, rendering the final RWE 920 EUR * 200% = 1.840 EUR. This amount would not be comparable with the 900 RWE calculated with the SEC-SA method, since the deductions are different. What is more, the analyst of this information does not know the amount of exposure value deducted for the SEC-ERBA calculation. Therefore, how should such deductions be considered for the memo calculations?