- Question ID
-
2021_5782
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Transparency and Pillar 3
- Article
-
Article 451a(3)
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
Article 451a(3)
- Type of submitter
-
Consultancy firm
- Subject matter
-
Elaboration of the template EU LIQ2 using supervisory data EBA/ITS/2020/04 - Annex XIII - Template EU LIQ2: Net Stable Funding Ratio
- Question
-
There seems to be inconsistencies at the level of the mapping tool for the elaboration of the template EU LIQ2 using superviosry data: specifically, while in CoRep templates C80 and C81 the assets/liabilities with no maturity are included in the "less than 6 months maturity" band, in the disclosure template these items are requested separately. This is inconsistent with the indications provided by the mapping tool: can the mapping tool be ignored?
- Background on the question
-
The amending regulation (EU) No 2019/876 (‘CRR2') introduced new disclosure requirements for institutions, and a mandate for the EBA to implement them in a way that conveys sufficiently comprehensive and comparable information for market participants to assess the risk profiles of institutions (Article 434a of the CRR2). The new ITS (EBA/ITS/2020/04) aim to reinforce market discipline, by increasing consistency and comparability of institutions' public disclosures, and to implement the CRR2 regulatory changes in alignment with the revised Basel Pillar 3 standards. The all-inclusive ITS provide a complete Pillar 3 disclosure framework that seeks to facilitate its implementation by institutions and to improve clarity for users of information. Furthermore, the disclosure ITS have been developed fostering consistency with supervisory reporting, and a mapping tool between quantitative disclosure data and reporting (as per DPM 3.0) is provided in order to facilitate compliance by institutions
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
This question has been rejected because because it has not identified a provision of a legal framework covered by this tool that creates uncertainty and for which an explanation is merited in terms or practical implementation or application; the issue it raises is beyond the remit of the Q&A process and as such it cannot be addressed via a Q&A.
The Single Rule Book Q&A tool has been established to provide explanations and non-binding interpretations on questions relating to the practical application or implementation of the provisions of legislative acts referred to in Article 1(2) of the EBA’s founding Regulation, as well as associated delegated and implementing acts, and guidelines and recommendations, adopted under these legislative acts. The Q&A process cannot, for example, consider issues which would require changes to the regulatory framework.
For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see “Additional background and guidance for asking questions”.
- Status
-
Rejected question