Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Delayed or deferred PIN for wearable devices

Is the PIN entered when the cardholder takes on wearable device on, still valid as a knowledge element for one or several transactions later the same day, if it can be ensured that the device has not been taken off?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2019_4783
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 25/09/2020

Termination rights – Distinguishing between Guidelines which are directed towards ‘all outsourcing arrangements’ from those that are directed towards ‘outsourcing arrangements for critical and important functions’

Are paragraphs 98 and 99 (section 13.4) of EBA/GL/2019/02 - Guidelines on outsourcing arrangements directed towards ‘outsourcing arrangements for critical and important functions’ only or ‘all outsourcing arrangements’?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4782
  • Topic: Internal governance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/11/2020

Dealing with leasing (car leasing) in the calculation of the structural liquidity ratio (NSFR)

Can leasing contracts (e.g. car leasing), which are accounted for as tangible fixed assets according to national accounting standards, be treated in the NSFR according to the actual inflow/cash flow?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4780
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/01/2022

Validation rule v6405_m

Validation rule v6405_m does not calculate right when the credit institution has only T1 capital and no T2 capital. Report is COREP own funds.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4778
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 08/05/2020

Treatment of open repos for leverage ratio exposure measure

Could securities financing transactions (SFT) with no explicit end date (but which can be unwound at any time by any counterparty, e.g. open repos) be considered as bearing economic similarity between open maturity and overnight SFTs? If so, is it possible to net the cash payables and cash receivables in SFTs with the same counterparty subject to contractual legal rights to close the trade on the next day and in principle similar to overnight trades?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/62 - DR with regard to the leverage ratio
  • ID: 2019_4777
  • Topic: Leverage ratio
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

More than one transaction from a single consumer initiated transaction

When a consumer elects to add an additional item to their purchase at the time of checkout (a cross sale) they are making two purchases from two different merchants in a single session. Is SCA required for both of these transactions? This would make the user experience very clumsy and awkward as the consumer would have to go through SCA twice in a row during a single checkout.

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4776
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/01/2022

Relevance of third country capital requirements for the calculation of minority interests amounts of a subsidiary to be included at the consolidated leve

When applying Article 84(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) in respect of subsidiary institutions in third countries, should the excess capital attributable to minorities be determined by applying, namely in subparagraph (i), the provisions and requirements of CRR, together with any additional local requirements, to the extent these have to be met with CET1 capital?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4775
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/12/2021

Definition of private equity exposures in articles 155(2) and 155(3)

Do “private equity exposures in sufficiently diversified portfolios” eligible to a Risk Weight (RW) of 190% in simple risk weight approach in article 155(2) and a PD of 65% in the PD/LGD approach in article 155(3) refer to any non-listed equity instrument and/or shares in a CIU or units in a CIU for which the underlying exposures are non-listed equity instruments, provided that they are part of a sufficiently diversified portfolio?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4774
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Scoping and content for template 6 of the EBA GL Disclosure of NPE/FBE

Should the gross carrying amount that should be reported in column “a” of template 6 of the EBA GL Disclosure of NPE/FBE be the gross carrying amount that is reported in Finrep template F20.07, or should it be the gross carrying amount from Finrep template 18? i.e. should it also include loans advances held for trading to non-financial corporations or not?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2018/10 - Guidelines on disclosure of non-performing and forborne exposures
  • ID: 2019_4768
  • Topic: Transparency and Pillar 3
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Treatment of tax accounts

Can a tax account be treated as a level 1 asset according to Article 10(1)(c) Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/16, and be included in the liquidity buffer?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2019_4764
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 01/04/2022

Clarification about the definition of default for retail exposures

It is unclear how to determine what should be considered as retail exposures for the purpose of the definition of default for retail exposures.What kind of exposures should be considered to determine default under Article 178 CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2016/07 - Guidelines on the application of the definition of default under Article 178 CRR
  • ID: 2019_4757
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Requirement for credit institutions and electronic money institutions wishing to offer PIS and AIS to take out professional indemnity insurance or a comparable guarantee / Obbligo di dotarsi di un'assicurazione per la responsabilità civile o analoga garanzia, per gli Enti creditizi o Istituti di moneta elettronica che vogliono offrire i servizi di PIS e AIS

Can an electronic money institution or a credit institution wishing to offer Payment Initiation Service (PIS) and Account information service (AIS) consider its own funds to be a guarantee that is comparable to professional indemnity insurance (PII)?***IT:   Un Istituto di Moneta elettronica o un Ente creditizio che vuole offrire i servizi di PIS e AIS, può considerare i fondi propri come analoga garanzia rispetto all’assicurazione per la responsabilità civile professionale? 

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2017/08 - Guidelines on the criteria on how to stipulate the minimum monetary amount of the professional indemnity insurance
  • ID: 2019_4753
  • Topic: Monetary amount of the professional indemnity insurance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Authorisation for the provision of PIS and AIS on behalf of other legal entities belonging to the same corporate group / Autorizzazione ad offrire servizi di PIS e AIS per conto di altre Legal Entity appartenenti allo stesso Gruppo societario

In a corporate group which is not listed in the register of banking groups and in which there is both an electronic money institution and a credit institution, can the electronic money institution offer payment initiation services (PIS) and account information services (AIS), including on behalf of the group’s credit institution that also provides the same service? Must the electronic money institution as a service provider offering PIS and AIS to clients of the group’s credit institution provide its own certificate, the group certificate, or the credit institution’s certificate to the other account servicing payment service providers (ASPSPs)? Or, as it is merely a service provider, is it the credit institution’s certificate that should be displayed? Can a corporate group request a group certificate to provide to the other ASPSPs and/or third party providers (TPPs)? *** IT:  In un Gruppo societario, che non è iscritto al registro dei Gruppi Bancari e al cui interno sono presenti sia un Istituto di moneta elettronica che un Ente creditizio, l’Istituto di moneta elettronica può offrire i servizi di PIS e AIS, anche per conto dell’Ente creditizio del Gruppo in qualità di fornitore del servizio stesso? L’Istituto di moneta elettronica che offre i servizi di PIS e AIS ai clienti dell’Ente creditizio di Gruppo, in qualità di fornitore del servizio, si deve presentare verso gli altri ASPSP con il proprio certificato, con il certificato di Gruppo oppure con il certificato dell’Ente creditizio? O in quanto mero fornitore del servizio, il certificato da esporre è quello dell’Ente creditizio? Un Gruppo societario può richiedere un certificato di Gruppo per presentarsi alle altre ASPSP e/o TPP?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2019_4752
  • Topic: Authorisation and registration
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 25/09/2020

Recognition criteria for off-balance sheet items for exposure value calculation

If based on the applicable accounting framework (IFRS-EU) it is concluded that there is no contingent liability that should be disclosed for accounting purposes, is it then still possible that an off-balance sheet item exists, which should be recognised for exposure value calculation per Articles 111 CRR or 166 CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4751
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Exposures towards QCCPs under CRR Art. 306 (2) under standardised method (C 07.00) - validation rules v0010_h, v0306_m, v0307_m, v0308_m and v0312_m

"Under Article 306 (2)of the CRR, where assets posted as collateral to a CCP or a clearing member are bankruptcy remote, should have Exposure Value (C 07.00, column {200}, rows {100}, {120}) of zero. Our understanding of the ITS on Supervisory Reporting is that the Original exposure pre conversion factors (C07.00, column {010}, rows {100}, {120}) of the transactions in question should hence also be zeroed out. The institution is currently reporting the Original exposure pre conversion factors as non-zero to avoid the blocking errors mentionned in the background, which is contrary to Article 306 (2) of the CRR. Could you please confirm if our understanding of the ITS is correct?"

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4749
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/07/2020

Are Validation rules v6263_m & v6264_m correct?

"In taxonomy 2.8 validation rules v6263_m & v6264_m are introduced for template C03. Validation rule v6263_m expects that the Overall Capital Requirement is equal to the following calculation. The Combined Buffer Requirement of the C 04.00 template divided by the total REA on the C 02.00 template plus the Total SREP capital requirement ratio. Validation rule v6264_m expects that the Overall Capital Requirement: To be made up of CET1 capital, is equal to the following calculation. The Combined Buffer Requirement of the C 04.00 template divided by the total REA on the C 02.00 template plus the Total SREP capital requirement ratio: To be made up of CET1 capital. How can these validation rules apply when the percentage of the calculation can differ from the SREP percentage imposed by the ECB?"

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4746
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/09/2020

Criteria for rating transfer

Can “clear policies” referred to in paragraph 62 – such as recognising the relationship between a subsidiary and its consolidating parent or recognising any other form of control as defined in Article 4(1)(37) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – which lack the features of a material contractual support – be considered as “appropriate guarantee", thereby supporting  the rating transfer?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2017/16 - Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures
  • ID: 2019_4745
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/12/2020

Validation rules v2815_m to v2823_m between FINREP and AE

Are validation rules v2815_m to v2823_m between FinRep and AssetEncumbrance plausible if an institution has to report significant portfolios as 'held for sale' in accordance with IFRS 5, in particular taking into account the intention of AssetEncumbrance?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4744
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Asset Encumbrance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

Compliance with SCA in offline mode on an aircraft without internet connection

How can Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) be applied in an offline environment onboard an airplane when chip and pin cannot be verified with a Point of Sale (POS) device? Specifically, how is dynamic linking achieved in an offline mode for airlines who don't have internet connectivity but instead have a closed wireless network to be able to make purchases onboard an aircraft?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2019_4740
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/12/2019